Showing posts with label gay. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gay. Show all posts

Monday, March 29, 2010

Colour me shocked.... SHOCKED!

Knock me over with a feather, we learned today Ricky Martin is... gay.


Here's another one you saw coming. (Or would have seen coming if you gave the slightest shit.)

That's right-- continuing the long tradition of officially coming out of the closet long after anyone cares or even really remembers who you are, late 90's Latin heartthrob Ricky Martin has announced his gaiety on his website, writing: " I am proud to say that I am a fortunate homosexual man. I am very blessed to be who I am. RM"

Babaluuuuuuuuuuuu!

Oh. Wait. Wrong Ricky. Oh well! Congratulations anyway, Mr. Martin!

What no People article, no gabies?

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Beyond Left and Right: Gays against marriage equality

I suppose the one thing both these folks have in common is that they're radical. From Just Out:
Controversial Portland author Jack Donovan(Jack Malebranche) is sounding the alarm as to why marriage equality hurts society, but military equality helps everyone.

Donovan, whose book Androphilia: A Manifesto has become a controversial cult classic for man-loving men in the Northwest and nationwide, recently partnered with the unconventionally conservative blogAlternative Right . His newest essay, “The Homosexual Question: Why Same-Sex Marriage is Wrong, but Repealing DADT is Right,” is just as thought-provoking, challenging, shocking, polarizing, and important as Androphilia and its follow-up Blood Brotherhood and Other Rites of Male Alliance.
And on the other end of the spectrum you have this from tidbit picked up by Towleroad:
An interview with Chanel designer Karl Lagerfeld by filmmaker Bruce LaBruce in the current issue of VICE magazine touches briefly on the subject of same-sex marriage. Lagerfeld doesn't believe in it.

LABRUCE: You are against the idea of gay marriage. I totally agree with you on that.
LAGERFELD: Yes, I’m against it for a very simple reason: In the 60s they all said we had the right to the difference. And now, suddenly, they want a bourgeois life.

LABRUCE: It’s normalizing.
LAGERFELD: For me it’s difficult to imagine—one of the papas at work and the other at home with the baby. How would that be for the baby? I don’t know. I see more lesbians married with babies than I see boys married with babies. And I also believe more in the relationship between mother and child than in that between father and child.

LABRUCE: I take it you don’t want children.
LAGERFELD: If I were interested in children, I would be a godfather—or a godmother. I don’t like the idea of taking people out of their lives and their contexts. If there were a child I wanted to adopt, I would try to find the family of the child and give them the money for an education in his life and his context.
Radical Masculinists and Fairies unite! These must be the folks working for Maggie Gallagher.

Saturday, February 27, 2010

Insurance Carriers

You know it's a good day when one of the most conservative industries in America starts marketing to the gays.

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Evangelical Leader: Quit Moralizing, focus on Discipleship

An interesting and provocative article about Gay Marriage hit the Christian News Wire. Meet House Church Leader Ken Eastburn:
"Creating a moral America is not God’s goal nor should it be ours. Instead, the Bible is clear that our focus should be to make disciples and seek first the Kingdom of God."
But he doesn't stop there. He challenges the very modern, American, liberal Christian understanding of the Kingdom of God as something that can be created on terra firma as a Christianesque Utopia:
"It is a common mistake for Christians to spend time, energy and resources in advocating for a morality that is consistent with their faith," says Eastburn, "But at the end of the day our goal, the command given to us by Jesus Christ, is to make disciples. When our time and energy is spent on moralizing a secular nation, we are sacrificing our ability to obey Christ's command."
He continues with a very traditional argument which to our ears sounds out of place as well as Provocative:
"Many Christians have their faith intertwined with their nationality and, as a result, believe that their efforts to legislate a specifically Christian morality are glorifying to God. But just the opposite is true. No matter how good America becomes, people are still separated from God by sin. The only agenda we should be spending ourselves on is the redemption offered through Jesus Christ."
Very Interesting. You're not going to save or evangelize people through legislation, only through personal outreach.

That's why it's been so strange for marriage equality supporters to see laws, liberal laws that carve out HUGE exceptions for religious groups and persons of faith from participating in same sex unions, the bills still fall in the face of an unwarranted out cry from religious groups. How is it an infringement upon your religious liberty to say that you don't have to participate, support, or celebrate a same sex union? If the state takes a neutral position on homosexuality how does that impede on your ability or the strength of your message to convince people of your position?

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

quiet ubiquity the final taboo


I was a fan of the SyFy show Battle Star Gallactica - as many of my friends were. So when SyFy announced and premiered Caprica - the prequel to the BSG series, I was more than excited to watch. It comes on Friday nights at 9, and most Fridays I'm out and about on the town so I dvr it to watch on Saturday morning or afternoon. This past Friday's episode, which was the series premier after the extra long pilot the previous week, was great. But something caught my attention.

As the Tauron mafioso Sam Adama is walking his nephew through the Tauron ghetto of Caprica city - he very nonchalantly explains to young William, future Admiral Adama, about he and Williams father began their lives on Caprica after leaving Tauron. He explained how he was trying to "pick up" a guy and William's father "picked up" the guy's sister. The conversation continued with Sam talking about how he and William's father got involved with the Tauron mafia before he breaks some one's window for his boss.

For the characters - the fact that Sam Adama, mafioso, series bad ass, is gay is no issue at all. For me the fan watching it was a "did he just say what I thought he said" moment, and through the power of dvr, and rewinding, I realized he did.

This to me is a huge step in the evolution of gays in popular culture. In decades past we weren't acknowledged at all or shown in a negative light. Then we were the humorous, or witty occasional characters. In the 90's the gays burst out of the closet and onto the main screen, most likely because of the horrors of the AIDS crisis. (well we gotta talk about the Gays somehow -- they're dying in the street!).

But still, when gays weren't presented as victims of disease we were presented on screen as the flamboyant caricature of what people assume gays to be.

I recall the first time that I had seen the ubiquity of homosexuality addressed, which in a way nullifies the ubiquity. In the Simpsons episode from 1997, Homer's phobia. Homer's new gay friend proceeds to take him to places all over Springfield where gays are present. At first the folks seem like your average Joe, then a song and dance number breaks out. It was funny and won many plaudits from media organizations and gay advocacy groups alike for it's positive treatment of the gay community. At one time Homer proclaims:
You know me Marge, I like my beers cold, my TV loud, and homosexuals FLAAAMMING.
It was funny, but it again characterized, like the song and dance numbers, how the straight world wanted, needed, to identify and classify the gay community.

Now most major networks have regular gay characters. From Will & Grace on NBC to Brothers & Sisters and Modern Family on ABC to Glee on Fox, and various Soap Operas on all the major Networks. Each show portrays the character in one light or the other but they all share one thing - the gay character is obsessed with being gay, that's their focus, that's their point of existence, that's how the world sees them -- navel gazers. It's just another caricature.

Granted these stereotypes are based in reality. There are certain segments of the community that are flamboyant, there are segments that are obsessed with being gay, I think it's the evolution of the community as we try to assert both our existence and negotiate our matriculation into the culture and society at large. That's the point of marriage equality and efforts to repeal DADT - it's not for special treatment, it's for equal treatment. We're here, we're queer, and we just want to be left alone.

Perhaps more shows will go the route of Caprica - perhaps others already have, there's a lot of TV programming out there folks -and show gays neither as flamboyant caricatures or as the gay character, after all that's the direction that gay community is moving - acknowledged, accepted, integrated, quiet ubiquity.

Or perhaps Caprica will go the direction of the others, and Sam Adama will make a production of his sexuality - it's too early to tell, but there is promise.