Showing posts with label Catholicism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Catholicism. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 9, 2010

This week in Anglicanorum Coetibus, ctd. II


The past few weeks have seen the largest affirmation of Anglicanorum Coetibus on these shores with 100 Anglican Church in America parishes voting to join the Catholic Church. This communion of churches does not have a presence in South Carolina - but, according to the website of the Diocese of the Eastern U.S. (DEUS for short interestingly enough), has three parishes in North Carolina: St Stephen's in Franklin, Our Lady of Good Counsel in Jacksonville, and St. Peter's in Waynesville.

As for disenchanted Anglicans in South Carolina, the episcopacy is gearing up for a turf war with the presiding bishop as more and more dioceses and churches move to distance themselves or separate out right from the national Episcopal Church. Oh the troubles of Charleston, meanwhile up river in Columbia - as Trinity Cathedral parish nears the end of the renovations - the upper diocese is awaiting the installation of their new Bishop, Andrew Waldo, who will hold the center much as the current, retiring ordinary Dorsey Henderson, if not tilt theologically liberal. His election was a surprise and came out of much tension and consternation.

Back to the Anglicans walking on the new bridge across the Tiber (bridge = the latin Pons, for which we get Pontifex, Pontiff, Pope, get it?). This week we got a glimpse body and soul of what the new Ordinariates will be like. First the Soul. Cardinal Levada gave a rousing speech on the new Ordinariates while in Canada - the goal of Christian Unity doesn't mean absorption into the monolith of the Roman Catholic Church. The Cardinal uses a distinctive, and well thought metaphor to describe the Union of these Anglicans with Rome. From Whispers in the Loggia:

Visible union with the Catholic Church does not mean absorption into a monolith, with the absorbed body being lost to the greater whole, the way a teaspoon of sugar would be lost if dissolved in a gallon of coffee. Rather, visible union with the Catholic Church can be compared to an orchestral ensemble. Some instruments can play all the notes, like a piano. There is no note that a piano has that a violin or a harp or a flute or a tuba does not have. But when all these instruments play the notes that the piano has, the notes are enriched and enhanced. The result is symphonic, full communion. One can perhaps say that the ecumenical movement wishes to move from cacophony to symphony, with all playing the same notes of doctrinal clarity, the same euphonic chords of sanctifying activity, observing the rhythm of Christian conduct in charity, and filling the world with the beautiful and inviting sound of the Word of God. While the other instruments may tune themselves according to the piano, when playing in concert there is no mistaking them for the piano. It is God’s will that those to whom the Word of God is addressed, the world, that is, should hear one pleasing melody made splendid by the contributions of many different instruments...

[The Catholic Church] believes that she is the mystical body of Christ and she is convinced that the Church of Christ subsists in her because she recognizes that, while she is like the piano that has all of the notes, that is, all of the elements of sanctification and truth, many of those notes are shared with other communities and those communities often have beautiful ways of sounding the notes that can lead to a heightened appreciation of truth and holiness, both within the Catholic Church and within her partners in the ecumenical endeavour....

To return to our earlier metaphor, people long for discordant tones and voices to be harmonized, united, and when an individual or, indeed, a community, is ready for unity with the Church of Christ that subsists in the Catholic Church, it would be a betrayal of Catholic ecumenical principles and goals to refuse to embrace them and to embrace them with all the distinctive gifts that enrich the Church, that help her approach the world symphonically, sounding together or united. Just as there is one Saviour, so there is one universal sacrament of Salvation, the Church. The Eastern Churches that are united to Rome are enjoined to preserve their distinct institutions, liturgical rites, ecclesiastical traditions and way of Christian life. By so doing, the Second Vatican Council teaches they do not harm the Church’s unity, but rather, make it manifest.

The experience we are embarking on with Anglicanorum coetibus promises also to make the Church’s fundamental unity manifest by adding to her life distinctive expressions of Christ’s gifts of holiness and truth. Nevertheless, a strict comparison between the Anglicans and the Eastern Church and Catholic Churches would not be correct, I hasten to add. The Eastern Churches, like the Ukrainian Catholic Church so numerous in Canada, are in the fullest sense of the term “Churches” since they have valid apostolic succession and thus valid Eucharist. They are therefore called Churches “sui juris” because they have their own legal structures of governance, all while maintaining bonds of hierarchical communion with the Bishop of Rome. The term Church is applied differently to the Anglican Communion for reasons rehearsed over a century ago by Pope Leo XIII in Apostolicae curae. So the legal framework for Anglican communities seeking full communion precisely as communities would be different from that of Eastern Churches. They remain a part of the Western Latin Church tradition. That is why the Holy Father has decided to erect personal ordinarities in order to provide pastoral care for such groups who wish to share their gifts corporately with their Catholic sisters and brothers and with whom they have shared a long history before the Reformation in the 16th century.

Running on the idea of the eastern churches, let's turn to the Australian Bishop who's been a kind of point man on the Roman side outside of the Roman Curia for all things Anglicanorum, Peter Elliott. From Damian Thompson:

Anglicanorum coetibus establishes a distinct community for Anglicans who choose to return to unity with the Successor of St Peter. But it is not accurate to call this an “Anglican Rite Ordinariate”. A better expression would be an “Anglican Use Personal Ordinariate”, that is, a structured community maintaining its own traditions, at the same time enjoying distinct liturgical privileges within the Roman Rite. To understand the proposed structure we may compare it with similar structures that already exist within the Catholic Church.

The Military Ordinariate

The proposed Anglican Use Ordinariate may be compared to the Military Ordinariate, set up in many countries, including Australia, the UK and the US. The Anglican Church of Australia has a similar structure. Anglicanorum coetibus refers to this structure in footnote 12.

A Military Ordinariate is kind of diocese covering a whole country but also “present” in places outside the country where military personnel serve, such as Afghanistan or East Timor. The bishop of the armed forces exercises ordinary jurisdiction over military chaplains and Catholic members of the armed forces – wherever they may be. Therefore his ministry relates directky to people and is more personal than territorial.

However, the structure proposed in Anglicanorum coetibis for an Anglican Use Personal Ordinariate is closer to a territorial diocese. There could be several Ordinariates in one country, which is not the case with the military structure. Therefore to better understand an Anglican Use Ordinariate we look into the venerable ancient Eastern Rites within the Catholic Church, properly called the Eastern Catholic Churches.

One Church: East and West

These autonomous Churches are in communion with Rome, but their members are not “Roman Catholics”, that is, not Catholics of the Roman Rite. I now need to open up something essential that many Anglicans do not understand – that the Catholic Church is not a monolithic structure. She is a communion of Churches, led by bishops who are in communion with the Bishop of Rome and with one another, members of one apostolic college. This unity through a communion of particular or local Churches is set out in the Dogmatic Constitution on the Church promulgated by the Second Vatican Council. Lumen Gentium, 23.

Every diocese is a “particular Church”, governed by a successor of the apostles. This is why we talk of the Church of Rome, the Church of Melbourne, the Church of Washington etc. Through a complex history beginning in apostolic times, most of these particular Churches today are grouped together within the Roman Rite. Not only are they in communion with the Church of Rome, the See of Peter, but they also use the liturgy of Rome. The members of these particular Churches may be known as Roman Catholics, or Catholics of the Roman Rite, or Latin Catholics.

At the same time, many other particular churches are grouped within a series of ancient Eastern Rites, also in communion with Rome, but using liturgies appropriate to their origins: Syrian, Greek, Egyptian, Armenian etc. Their members are Ukrainian Catholics, Maronite Catholics, Coptic Catholics etc. They are not Roman Catholics. This is why it is wrong to lump us all together and call everyone in communion with Rome a “Roman Catholic”. I can describe myself in those terms, but my fellow Ukrainian Catholic should not – and will not – describe himself as an “RC”. So to sum it up, within the Catholic Church there is a wide range of Catholics and worshipping communities of Christian people.

Diocese and Eparchy

Looking more closely into these Eastern Catholic Churches, we first find typical territorial dioceses in the home country: Ukraine, Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, India, Iraq etc. But then we find a second kind of diocese for those members of these Churches who have emigrated and are now scattered across a country such as Canada or Australia. This kind of diocese is usually, not always, called an eparchy.

In an eparchy an Eastern Rite bishop has jurisdiction over all the clergy and lay faithful of his Rite, within a country or within a region in a big country such as Canada. For example, the Ukrainian Catholic bishop with a fine cathedral in North Melbourne is the bishop of the Eparchy of St Peter and Paul, Australia. He has ordinary jurisdiction over all Ukrainian Catholics in Australia. His people are also known as “Greek Catholics” because they celebrate the liturgy of Constantinople, the Byzantine Rite.

The same kind of structure also applies to the Maronite diocese of St Maroun, the Chaldean Diocese of St Thomas and the Eparchy of St Michael the Archangel for Melchite Greek Catholics, all based in Sydney. The territory of these bishops coexists with the dioceses of the Roman Rite in Australia and the bishops are members of the Australian Catholic Bishops Conference.

The Anglican Use Ordinariate

The Ordinary of an Anglican Use Personal Ordinariate will be like an eparch, having jurisdiction and pastoral care over a series of parishes, “juridically comparable to a diocese”. But he will “teach, sanctify and govern” within the Western tradition, the Roman Rite, and that is the interesting and new development in Anglicanorum coetibus. There is also another closer similarity between the proposed Anglican Use Personal Ordinariates and Eastern Catholic eparchies. That may be described as a distinctive “ethos” based on a liturgical tradition and a wide range of customs, history, spiritualities and culture, never forgetting the personal bonds between people and families. In your case this will be the Anglican patrimony. We will look more closely at this in due course.

In full communion with the Successor of St Peter, members of each Personal Ordinariate will be gathered in distinctive communities that preserve elements of Anglican worship, spirituality and culture that are compatible with Catholic faith and morals. Members of an Ordinariate will be able to worship according to own liturgical “use”, while still being Catholics of the Roman Rite. So in the Ordinariate you will be “Roman Catholics” or “Latin Catholics”, part of the largest group in the Universal Church. At the same time, like the Eastern Rite Catholics, you will be the bearers of a distinctive and respected tradition. Your Ordinaries, bishops or priests, will work alongside bishops of the Roman Rite dioceses and the bishops of Eastern Rite eparchies and dioceses, finding their place within the Episcopal Conference in each nation or region.

Still no one knows exactly how the liturgies of the Ordinariate will look, whether it's an expansion of the current Anglican Use or some new (old?) liturgical structure. Beyond praxis and structure of the Ordinariate is there support mechanisms in place in the state for these 100 parishes of soon to be new Catholics? While there's a support group for the Ordinariate in the UK, there's no formal support group group in the US, but that's probably because the ground work for the structures have been laid with the network of Anglican Use parishes in the states - though that's not to say they won't need all the prayers and material support they can get from local Roman Catholics.

Previous Posts:


Spire Envy

photo from here.

It's a proud day for the city of Charleston, and the Catholic citizenry in particular.

The Holy City's sky line just became holier. One hundred years in the making, and it finally happened, the Cathedral of St. John the Baptist in Charleston has been "completed" with the addition of the church's steeple. You can see a bloggy time line of the steeple construction and installation at the Cathedral Restoration website, along with additional pictures, and video of each step in the process.

The new steeple is gorgeous, Its design is a marriage of traditional concepts with modern design in order to keep the whole structure safe in case of hurricanes and earthquakes - two natural disasters that Charleston is intimately familiar with. The church now stands at 167 ft. tall.

According to The Post and Courier:
That's less than 20 feet below the tip of St. Michael's Church spire just down Broad Street and about 30 feet lower than St. Philip's Church -- the other tall landmark in the oldest part of downtown Charleston.
Uh oh, think I'm suffering from spire envy. Actually in this case, it's not so much about the height, no this isn't a euphemistic joke... it's more about the proportions of the copper structure to the brownstone belfry/tower. It's most apparent in the above photo with St. Michaels in the background. I'm hoping that it's just a camera trick, from looking at photos from the restoration site, it may be a camera trick... or it could be the shiny newness of the copper structure, perhaps it needs to oxidize to a nice green - which could take 20 years.

But, I'm happy for our see church, and the Holy city, and i'm sure that it'll grow on me beyond the appreciation for the individual structure itself.

The Post and Courier has more photos here.

Monday, March 8, 2010

Book Review: The Last Cato

The Last Cato - Matilde Asensi, $13.95

In high school Iloved reading the Divine Commedy. As I was clicking through BN.com I found the book The Last Cato. Because the quick caption on the back mentioned that this book used elements of the Divine Comedy, I had to pick it up and read it. Got to love impulse shopping.

I do admit though that prior to reading this novel, though not before buying it, for better or worse, I checked a couple of reviews. Most people started by saying "if you liked the Da Vinci code..." which was, to be honest, off putting.

The Da Vinci Code was a poorly written American novel that combined the worst aspects of left and right wingnuttery - antiChristian pomo-paganism and a baseless obsession with conspiracy theories. It only grazed plausibility with loose connections to any facts surrounding the historical characters or groups included in the work, which is why it deserves wholeheartedly the categorization as fiction. Like I said before though, it was poorly written fiction.

The Last Cato, which was published three years prior to the Da Vinci Code, does not embrace wingnuttery, is not antichristian, though it's not a hagiography of the modern churches. It does criticize utilizing liberal historical criticism, and veiled feminist criticism, and to a degree it contains a certain level of religious skepticism and anti-clericalism - which seems to fit the profile of the author: Woman born in continental Europe during the 60s - a stereotype true, but one that fits. But one thing is clear - the work is not a part of the bandwagon that says that religion is bad and that modern churches have ruined what was otherwise some good morals.

The book utilizes the historical and literary context of Dante's Comedy, to take our characters across the ancient Christian capitols of the Mediterranean world from catacomb to catacomb in search of the stolen relics of the lignum crucis. The narrative incorporates often neglected themes from Byzantine and early Medieval Church history to paint an historical picture, that while clearly fictionalized, has plausibility.

That's not to say that the book is without problems. The characters at times seemed shallow, and unknowable. There were also problems within the character dialog as well as narration with bland colloquialisms and out of place references that could have been used without. When this happened, and thankfully it happened rarely, it seemed as if there was a rupture in the story telling. It was as if the author was trying to deliberately input an ideological point that was otherwise obvious within the characters construction. The chief problem though was the translation. Originally written in Spanish, the English translation at times butchered what to that point was evenly flowing text - which could help explain some of the other narrative flaws because inherently something is always lost in translation

On the whole though, it was an enjoyable read, once I got into it, I really didn't want to put it down. It made more sense and held more appeal than the tripe that Dan Brown puts out. If done properly, it would also make a better movie than his work. One can only hope that future editions will be translated more accurately - and from looking at the titles the author has produced since the release of the Last Cato in 2001 - that more of her work will be translated.

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Upcoming Birthday

It's all I can do to make it through this week, with the Pink Party fast approaching my brain has been focused like a laser, and it'll be sweet relief once that's over and done with. Then I get to look forward to a weekend that'll be just as packed with a birthday party, a trip to Cheraw, and a Sunday night Oscar party hosted by a yard sale with legs.

So I'll be looking forward to serene quiet of my 27th Birthday next Wednesday, March 10. It'll be serene because I'll be joining the YACs in a Vesper service. It'll be a great relief compared to these hectic days.

Saturday, February 27, 2010

The first week of Lent and Sushi

What's the connection between the first week of Lent and Sushi?

In Latin we call the Ember Days the Quatuor Tempora, or "four times" of the year. This Latin term gave rise to a form of foodwhich I am sure you all know.

In the 16th c. Spanish and Portuguese missionaries settled in Nagasaki, Japan. From their interest in inculturation and out of sensitivity for the ways of the people, they tried to make meatless meals for Embertide, which is a fast time. They started deep-frying shrimp. The Japanese ran with and developed it to perfection. This is “tempura,” again from the Latin term for the Ember Days "Quatuor Tempora".

Monday, February 15, 2010

This week in Anglicanorum Coetibus, ctd.

Previously I noted the rhetorical divide in understanding how the Apostolic Constitution is to be implemented and what it means for Anglo-Catholics. There was other news that flew under the radar.

The "new ecumenism" espoused by the Pope, while an affront to many Anglicans, is being practiced by... you guessed it, the Anglicans.

Per Ruth Gledhill the Methodist Church has pulled a TAC with their organizational President and Vice President saying,
'Methodists approach the Covenant with the Church of England in the spirituality of that Covenant prayer. So when we say to God, "let me have all things let me have nothing," we say it by extension to our partners in the Church of England as well. We are prepared to go out of existence not because we are declining or failing in mission, but for the sake of mission. In other words we are prepared to be changed and even to cease having a separate existence as a Church if that will serve the needs of the Kingdom.'
While Ruth looks at this rather cheekily, we're on the same page about this: how is this any different than Hepworth Primate of the TAC making overtures to the Holy See, leading up to the edict of the Apostolic Constitution? She points out some concerns both communions see as potential stumbling points.
Some Methodists are not sure about whether they want bishops or not, and some Anglicans, from the ranks of those who oppose women bishops, are not sure about whether they want Methodists. The reasons for both oppositions are the same: questions around orders and the Apostolic succession. But the Methodists might be prepared to accept bishops if women are allowed to join their ranks in the Church of England, as Methodism is fully inclusive of women in all leadership positions.
The parallels between these realignments is pretty amazing. It's not just the hurdles that both groups have to overcome it's also a matter of history and direction.

For Anglicans and Catholics there's ARCIC, for the Anglicans and Methodists, in Great Britain it is their covenant. For both it's a matter of realizing that at some point there's nothing more to talk about. For ARCIC it was a matter of lots of good work and then a break down because of the controversial stances the Anglicans have taken ecclisiologically.

In regards to the covenant, it is interesting to note the formal agreement to seek unity was signed in 2003, the same year that ARCIC talks were suspended. That being noted, the covenant seemed to state what was already known, that the two bodies were moving closer theologically and in mission (social justice).

It's also like watching a great game of Chess, or Risk as those who are deemed theologically 'conservative' amass on one side of the board and the liberals on the other, all in the name of 'Christian Unity.' The obvious question is, Unity to what end?

To note, on this side of the Atlantic, I don't believe the United Methodist Church and Episcopal Church have any plans to merge.


Monday, February 8, 2010

This week in Anglicanorum Coetibus


Within days of each other two prelates - one Catholic, one Anglican (CofE) release opposing statements on the Apostolic Constitution Anglicanorum Coetibus.

First is Bishop Peter J Elliot, Roman Catholic Auxiliary Bishop of Melbourne Australia. He says of the Anglicans that ferry the Tiber that they will be "United in Communion but not absorbed." The other is the Anglican Archbishop of York, Dr. Peter Sentamu. As reported in the Telegraph, Dr. Sentamu told the BBC recently of these Anglicans that "they wouldn't be 'proper Catholics.'"

Other than guffaw from these shores, I'll leave it to Damian Thompson to take the good Archbishop of York to task for his spectacularly ignorant and offensive statements.

On this side of the pond the response to the apostolic constitution has been positive from the Roman Catholic perspective. After all it was in America that the precursor to the Ordinariate was established with the Anglican 'Use' parishes.

As far as reactions from the Episcopal Church - it's been pretty muted as that ecclessial community is still in upheaval internally. The national church is taking on individual clerics, congregations, and dioceses as they align with more conservative Anglican provinces.Interestingly while visiting Charleston, SC the former Bishop of Rochester, Pakistani born Michael Nazir-Ali, mused on Constitution that the Vatican has created a Presbyterian Ordinariate because "the Proposal offered no Bishops from the Roman Catholic Church for the fleeing Anglicans."

A little further upstream there's no word yet if the local Anglo Catholic church, Church of the Good Shepherd, is considering the Ordinariate with their spiritual, doctrinal, and liturgical closeness to the Catholic Church.

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Blog Tips for the Pope

If you missed NPR's All Things Considered this evening, you missed a great segment about the Pope and Blogging "Give Us This Day Thy Daily Post." It was in response to last weeks previewed release of Benedict's address for World Day of Communications where the pontiff encouraged priests to blog and engage in New Media.

Interestingly enough plenty of priests have preemptively jumped on the New Media bandwagon and some of them have pretty large followings. You can find a [short] list of some of them at the bottom of the post.

The segment included two notable Catholic bloggers, interstingly enough one from a more 'conservative' camp and the other 'liberal;' The Anchoress (Elizabeth Scalia) of the magazine First Things and Fr. James Martin, SJ of the magazine America. Thankfully theological partisanship was put aside and it ended up being a pretty humorous bit, especially when Scalia suggested:
"He should have some favourite YouTube videos that he can just slap up there when he's feeling kind of tired. Like the parade scene from Ferris Beuller. Slap that up there and that's a days blogging."



But it wasn't just light hearted, Fr. Martin had a good point when it comes to blogging about comments and specifically commenters:
"I would say there are two kinds of angry people. There are angry people, and then there are religiously angry people. And the religiously angry people tend to be angrier than the angry people."
I know all about comments and commenters, but I still allow them, so bring it.

*** Some Catholic Priests who blog ***